EFAV vs RODM: Differences, Returns & Fees

EFAV and RODM hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and RODM returned +18.8% over the year. Net assets: $5.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF, and $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF.

EFAV costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.5 points.

EFAVRODM
Expense ratio0.20%0.29%
Net assets, EFAV as of Oct 9, 2026 and RODM as of Jul 31, 2026$5.3bn$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year+12.3%+18.8%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.8%11.1%
Below its high3.7%, high on Sep 3, 20264.3%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+12.3%
EFAV total return, 1 year
+18.8%
RODM total return, 1 year
0.20%
EFAV expense ratio
0.29%
RODM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EFAV and RODM hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

27% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding EFAV RODM
OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING 1.27% 1.00%
BOC HONG KONG HOLDINGS LTD 0.95% 1.13%
NOVARTIS AG 1.31% 0.88%
ORANGE SA 0.92% 0.84%
KONINKLIJKE AHOLD DELHAIZE 0.74% 0.77%
SWISSCOM AG 1.30% 0.71%
TOTALENERGIES 1.40% 0.68%
BANK HAPOALIM BM 0.95% 0.63%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.59% 0.65%
UNITED OVERSEAS BANK 0.70% 0.58%
COLES GROUP LTD 0.51% 0.78%
OTSUKA CORP 0.51% 0.80%
Only in EFAV
EQUINOR 1.54%
ENI 1.50%
SOFTBANK 1.17%
JAPAN TOBACCO 1.08%
SAMPO CLASS A 1.08%
OBIC LTD 0.97%
SWISS PRIME SITE AG 0.91%
POWER ASSETS HOLDINGS 0.90%
Only in RODM
Royal Bank of Canada 1.22%
Bank of Montreal 1.21%
Equinor ASA 1.20%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 1.14%
Millicom International Cellular SA 1.07%
Great-West Lifeco Inc 1.05%
Bank of Nova Scotia/The 0.98%
GSK PLC 0.85%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

EFAV
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +12.3% +18.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −4.9 pts +1.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.29%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 270 336
Net assets, EFAV as of Oct 9, 2026 and RODM as of Jul 31, 2026 $5.3bn $1.6bn

EFAV and RODM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EFAV in plain words

EFAV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 270 positions, with the top ten at 14.8%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

RODM in plain words

RODM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 336 positions, with the top ten at 11.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFAV or RODM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFAV returned +12.3% and RODM +18.8%.
Which is cheaper, EFAV or RODM?
EFAV is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EFAV and RODM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFAV and 0% of RODM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EFAV against RODM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efav-vs-rodm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.