FNDX vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees

FNDX and JAVA hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned +24.4% over the year. Net assets: $25.5bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $7.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.

FNDX costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.1 points.

FNDX vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDXJAVA
Expense ratio0.25%0.44%
Net assets, FNDX as of May 31, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026$25.5bn$7.2bn
Total return, 1 year+24.4%+20.3%
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common40%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund22.4%30.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+24.4%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+20.3%
JAVA total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.44%
JAVA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and JAVA hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

40% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FNDX JAVA
Apple Inc 4.63% 3.93%
Microsoft Corp 2.32% 6.31%
Amazon.com Inc 1.85% 7.76%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41% 1.32%
Meta Platforms Inc 1.24% 1.55%
Chevron Corp 1.48% 1.22%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.37% 1.18%
Johnson & Johnson 0.96% 1.28%
Bank of America Corp 0.87% 2.19%
Citigroup Inc 0.85% 1.39%
AT&T Inc 0.81% 0.70%
Merck & Co Inc 0.68% 0.78%
Only in FNDX
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%
Micron Technology Inc 1.59%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38%
Verizon Communications Inc 0.99%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.90%
General Motors Co 0.74%
Pfizer Inc 0.69%
Broadcom Inc 0.65%
Only in JAVA
NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.89%
GATES INDUSTRIAL CORP 0.68%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.66%
HUBSPOT INC COMMON STOCK 0.54%
KONTOOR BRANDS INC 0.44%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO 0.41%
FLOWSERVE CORP COMMON 0.35%
COSTAR GROUP INC COMMON 0.33%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +24.4% +20.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +26.4% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark not available −6.2 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.44%
Already in the S&P 500 90.6% 90.4%
Holdings 733 151
Net assets, FNDX as of May 31, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026 $25.5bn $7.2bn

FNDX and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FNDX

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.4%.

About JAVA

JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or JAVA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +24.4% and JAVA +20.3%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or JAVA?
FNDX is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDX and JAVA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 91% of FNDX and 90% of JAVA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-java

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.