FNDB vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees

FNDB and IWD hold 56% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned +26.4% over the year. Net assets: $1.3bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF, and $82.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

IWD costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.8 points; IWD is far larger, $62.6bn against $917m.

FNDB vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDBIWD
Expense ratio0.25%0.18%
Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025$917m$62.6bn
Total return, 1 year+23.6%+26.4%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQRussell 1000 Value Index
Holdings in common56%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.8%30.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+23.6%
FNDB total return, 1 year
+26.4%
IWD total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDB expense ratio
0.18%
IWD expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDB and IWD hold 56% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

56% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FNDB IWD
Apple Inc 4.29% 6.01%
Microsoft Corp 2.16% 5.35%
Amazon.com Inc 1.72% 6.28%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.31% 2.59%
Intel Corp 2.38% 1.29%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.28% 2.40%
Chevron Corp 1.37% 1.06%
Walmart Inc 0.94% 1.20%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.27% 0.92%
Johnson & Johnson 0.90% 1.70%
Cisco Systems Inc 0.84% 1.26%
Bank of America Corp 0.80% 0.88%
Only in FNDB
Alphabet Inc 2.20%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.12%
Alphabet Inc 1.75%
Micron Technology Inc 1.48%
Broadcom Inc 0.60%
Caterpillar Inc 0.56%
NVIDIA Corp 0.51%
Applied Materials Inc 0.43%
Only in IWD
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.87%
MCDONALDS CORP 0.45%
PROLOGIS REIT 0.33%
LOWES COMPANIES INC 0.28%
EQUINIX REIT 0.27%
WILLIAMS 0.24%
MARSH 0.23%
TJX 0.22%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year +23.6% +26.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +26.5% (VONV)
Gap to its benchmark not available −0.1 pts vs VONV
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 84.4% 90.0%
Holdings 1637 871
Net assets, FNDB as of May 31, 2026 and IWD as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.3bn $82.9bn

FNDB and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FNDB

FNDB tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,637 positions, with the top ten at 20.8%.

About IWD

IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 30.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDB or IWD?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDB returned +23.6% and IWD +26.4%.
Which is cheaper, FNDB or IWD?
IWD is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDB and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of FNDB and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDB against IWD, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndb-vs-iwd

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.