FFLC vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees

FFLC and IWV hold 35% of their weight in the same names, and IWV returned +16.7% over the year. Net assets: $1.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF, and $20.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 3000 ETF.

IWV costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points; IWV is 16.8 times larger.

FFLC vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees
FFLCIWV
Expense ratio0.38%0.20%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$1.2bn$20.3bn
Total return, 1 year+15.3%+16.7%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 3000 Index
Holdings in common35%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.5%34.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+15.3%
FFLC total return, 1 year
+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
0.38%
FFLC expense ratio
0.20%
IWV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FFLC and IWV hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

35% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FFLC IWV
NVIDIA CORP 8.35% 7.15%
APPLE INC 4.18% 6.51%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.55% 3.40%
ALPHABET INC 7.10% 2.74%
MICROSOFT CORP 2.60% 5.32%
BROADCOM INC 2.48% 2.25%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.94% 2.11%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.96% 0.93%
VISA INC 1.90% 0.87%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 0.75% 1.32%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.65% 0.47%
COCA COLA CO 0.73% 0.46%
Only in FFLC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MFG CO LTD 2.40%
ELI LILLY and CO 1.67%
WELLS FARGO and CO 1.57%
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECH CORP 1.37%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 1.28%
SHELL PLC 1.21%
BANK NEW YORK MELLON CORP 0.91%
IMPERIAL OIL LTD 0.88%
Only in IWV
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21%
TESLA INC 1.49%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28%
ELI LILLY 1.26%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.19%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.84%
ABBVIE 0.65%
WALMART 0.65%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +15.3% +16.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +16.8% (VTHR)
Gap to its benchmark not available −0.1 pts vs VTHR
Expense ratio 0.38% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 82.9% 87.8%
Holdings 115 2600
Net assets, FFLC as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWV as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.2bn $20.6bn

FFLC and IWV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FFLC

FFLC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 83% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 115 positions, with the top ten at 39.5%.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FFLC or IWV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FFLC returned +15.3% and IWV +16.7%.
Which is cheaper, FFLC or IWV?
IWV is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FFLC and IWV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 83% of FFLC and 88% of IWV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FFLC against IWV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fflc-vs-iwv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.