FELC vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees

FELC and IWV hold 52% of their weight in the same names, and FELC returned +19.2% over the year. Net assets: $8.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF, and $20.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 3000 ETF.

FELC costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.5 points; IWV is 2.4 times larger.

FELC vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees
FELCIWV
Expense ratio0.18%0.20%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$8.6bn$20.3bn
Total return, 1 year+19.2%+16.7%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 3000 Index
Holdings in common52%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.4%34.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+19.2%
FELC total return, 1 year
+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
0.18%
FELC expense ratio
0.20%
IWV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FELC and IWV hold 52% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

52% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FELC IWV
NVIDIA CORP 7.95% 7.15%
APPLE INC 7.00% 6.51%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.03% 5.32%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.90% 3.40%
ALPHABET INC 3.69% 2.74%
BROADCOM INC 3.19% 2.25%
ALPHABET INC 2.40% 2.21%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.19% 2.11%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.11% 1.55%
TESLA INC 1.29% 1.49%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 0.86% 1.32%
ABBVIE INC 1.16% 0.65%
Only in FELC
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC DEL 1.94%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 1.54%
ELI LILLY and CO 1.44%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.18%
EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.02%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION NEW 0.92%
SCHWAB CHARLES CORP 0.77%
WELLS FARGO and CO 0.77%
Only in IWV
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28%
ELI LILLY 1.26%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.19%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.93%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.84%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.62%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.54%
CHEVRON 0.53%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +19.2% +16.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +16.8% (VTHR)
Gap to its benchmark not available −0.1 pts vs VTHR
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 93.9% 87.8%
Holdings 252 2600
Net assets, FELC as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWV as of Oct 9, 2026 $8.6bn $20.6bn

FELC and IWV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FELC

FELC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 252 positions, with the top ten at 38.4%.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FELC or IWV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FELC returned +19.2% and IWV +16.7%.
Which is cheaper, FELC or IWV?
FELC is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FELC and IWV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of FELC and 88% of IWV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FELC against IWV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/felc-vs-iwv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.