EUSA vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees

EUSA and IWB hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned +16.6% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1.9bn for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF and $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.

EUSA costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.9 points; IWB is far larger, $49.6bn against $1.9bn.

EUSA vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
EUSAIWB
Expense ratio0.09%0.15%
Net assets$1.9bn$49.6bn
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+16.6%
What it tracksMSCI USA Equal Weighted IndexRussell 1000 Index
Holdings in common43%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund2.8%36.1%
Below its high4.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+12.7%
EUSA total return, 1 year
+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
0.09%
EUSA expense ratio
0.15%
IWB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EUSA and IWB hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

43% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding EUSA IWB
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.28% 0.38%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 0.27% 2.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 0.26% 1.38%
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC CLASS C 0.27% 0.25%
ARISTA NETWORKS 0.24% 0.31%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 0.24% 0.33%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.24% 0.65%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 0.24% 0.47%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.23% 0.30%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.23% 0.67%
SALESFORCE 0.23% 0.25%
ANALOG DEVICES 0.22% 0.28%
Only in EUSA
TE CONNECTIVITY PLC 0.22%
MERCADOLIBRE 0.20%
NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.20%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.19%
WASTE CONNECTIONS 0.18%
AMRIZE AG 0.16%
Only in IWB
SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY 0.12%
MODERNA 0.11%
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.08%
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 0.07%
COUPANG CLASS A 0.03%
DYNATRACE INC 0.03%
GUARDANT HEALTH 0.03%
HF SINCLAIR 0.03%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the Russell 1000
Total return, 1 year +12.7% +16.6%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +16.8% (VONE)
Gap to its benchmark not available −0.1 pts vs VONE
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 84.2% 91.7%
Holdings 517 1025
Net assets $1.9bn $49.6bn

EUSA and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About EUSA

EUSA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 517 positions, with the top ten at 2.8%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EUSA or IWB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EUSA returned +12.7% and IWB +16.6%.
Which is cheaper, EUSA or IWB?
EUSA is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EUSA and IWB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of EUSA and 92% of IWB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EUSA against IWB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eusa-vs-iwb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.