DUSA vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees

DUSA and IWD hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned +26.4% over the year. Net assets: $1.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF, and $82.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

IWD costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.8 points; IWD is far larger, $81.9bn against $1.3bn.

DUSA vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees
DUSAIWD
Expense ratio0.59%0.18%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$1.3bn$81.9bn
Total return, 1 year+17.6%+26.4%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 1000 Value Index
Holdings in common13%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund54.4%30.0%
Below its high4.5%, high on Aug 4, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+17.6%
DUSA total return, 1 year
+26.4%
IWD total return, 1 year
0.59%
DUSA expense ratio
0.18%
IWD expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DUSA and IWD hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

13% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DUSA IWD
AMAZON.COM INC 5.71% 6.28%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 4.11% 2.59%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.17% 0.92%
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 4.59% 0.77%
WELLS FARGO + CO 3.21% 0.68%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 1.69% 0.44%
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 6.73% 0.32%
CVS HEALTH CORP 5.28% 0.30%
US BANCORP 6.11% 0.24%
CIGNA GROUP 3.12% 0.20%
DEVON ENERGY CORP 5.55% 0.15%
MARKEL GROUP INC 4.60% 0.06%
Only in DUSA
ALPHABET INC CL C 4.98%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 4.15%
TOURMALINE OIL CORP 1.41%
TECK RESOURCES LTD CLS B 0.96%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 0.94%
Only in IWD
APPLE 6.01%
MICROSOFT 5.35%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.40%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.87%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.70%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.29%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.26%
ABBVIE 1.21%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

DUSA
Davis Select U.S. Equity ETF
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year +17.6% +26.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.4% (IWD) +26.5% (VONV)
Gap to its benchmark −8.8 pts vs IWD −0.1 pts vs VONV
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 78.6% 90.0%
Holdings 26 871
Net assets, DUSA as of Jul 31, 2026 and IWD as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.3bn $82.9bn

DUSA and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About DUSA

DUSA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 79% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

About IWD

IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 30.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DUSA or IWD?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DUSA returned +17.6% and IWD +26.4%.
Which is cheaper, DUSA or IWD?
IWD is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DUSA and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 79% of DUSA and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DUSA against IWD, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusa-vs-iwd

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.