EAGL vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees

EAGL and IWD hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned +26.4% over the year. Net assets: $4.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF, and $82.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

IWD costs 0.62 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.2 points; IWD is 18.7 times larger.

EAGL vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees
EAGLIWD
Expense ratio0.80%0.18%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$4.3bn$79.7bn
Total return, 1 year+12.2%+26.4%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 1000 Value Index
Holdings in common14%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund58.3%30.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+12.2%
EAGL total return, 1 year
+26.4%
IWD total return, 1 year
0.80%
EAGL expense ratio
0.18%
IWD expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EAGL and IWD hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

14% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding EAGL IWD
AMAZON.COM INC 7.64% 6.28%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.88% 5.35%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 6.89% 0.92%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.02% 0.77%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 5.23% 0.44%
DANAHER CORP 5.18% 0.37%
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 3.61% 0.32%
S&P GLOBAL INC 4.68% 0.32%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC 1.58% 0.24%
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & COMPANY 3.20% 0.16%
INTUIT INC 2.19% 0.15%
HUMANA INC 4.04% 0.14%
Only in EAGL
MERCADOLIBRE INC 6.91%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LTD 6.64%
LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE GROUP PLC 6.42%
ALPHABET INC 4.70%
SAP SE 3.97%
MASTERCARD INC 3.94%
ASML HOLDING NV 1.85%
LIBERTY BROADBAND CORP 0.69%
Only in IWD
APPLE 6.01%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.59%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.40%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.87%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.70%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.29%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.26%
ABBVIE 1.21%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

EAGL
Eagle Capital Select Equity ETF
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Eagle Capital iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year +12.2% +26.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +17.3% (VOO) +26.5% (VONV)
Gap to its benchmark −5.1 pts vs VOO −0.1 pts vs VONV
Expense ratio 0.80% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 70.6% 90.0%
Holdings 27 871
Net assets, EAGL as of Jun 30, 2026 and IWD as of Oct 9, 2026 $4.3bn $82.9bn

EAGL and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About EAGL

EAGL is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.80% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 71% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 58.3%.

About IWD

IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 30.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EAGL or IWD?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EAGL returned +12.2% and IWD +26.4%.
Which is cheaper, EAGL or IWD?
IWD is cheaper, by 0.62 percentage points a year. That is about $62 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EAGL and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 71% of EAGL and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EAGL against IWD, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eagl-vs-iwd

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.