DFIV vs RODM: Differences, Returns & Fees
DFIV and RODM hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and DFIV returned +24.2% over the year. Net assets on Jul 31, 2026: $21.4bn for Dimensional International Value ETF and $1.6bn for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF.
DFIV costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.4 points; DFIV is 13.2 times larger.
| DFIV | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.27% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $21.4bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.2% | +18.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 28% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 15.5% | 11.1% |
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | 4.3%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFIV and RODM hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
28% in common
On the same fields
DFIV and RODM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFIV in plain words
DFIV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +24.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.27% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 623 positions, with the top ten at 15.5%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RODM in plain words
RODM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 336 positions, with the top ten at 11.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFIV or RODM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFIV returned +24.2% and RODM +18.8%.
- Which is cheaper, DFIV or RODM?
- DFIV is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DFIV against RODM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfiv-vs-rodm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DFIV against RODM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfiv-vs-rodm
[DFIV against RODM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfiv-vs-rodm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.