FNDF vs RODM: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDF and RODM hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and FNDF returned +28.5% over the year. Net assets: $24.6bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF, and $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF.
FNDF costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.7 points.
| FNDF | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, FNDF as of May 31, 2026 and RODM as of Jul 31, 2026 | $24.6bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +28.5% | +18.8% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 28% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 17.0% | 11.1% |
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | 4.3%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDF and RODM hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
28% in common
On the same fields
FNDF and RODM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDF in plain words
FNDF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +28.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 1% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 889 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RODM in plain words
RODM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 336 positions, with the top ten at 11.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDF or RODM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDF returned +28.5% and RODM +18.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDF or RODM?
- FNDF is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDF against RODM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-rodm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FNDF against RODM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-rodm
[FNDF against RODM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-rodm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.