FNDF vs RODM: Differences, Returns & Fees

FNDF and RODM hold 28% of their weight in the same names, and FNDF returned +28.5% over the year. Net assets: $24.6bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF, and $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF.

FNDF costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.7 points.

FNDFRODM
Expense ratio0.25%0.29%
Net assets, FNDF as of May 31, 2026 and RODM as of Jul 31, 2026$24.6bn$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year+28.5%+18.8%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common28%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%11.1%
Below its high4.8%, high on Sep 4, 20264.3%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+28.5%
FNDF total return, 1 year
+18.8%
RODM total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDF expense ratio
0.29%
RODM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDF and RODM hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

half

28% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FNDF RODM
Roche Holding AG 0.82% 0.90%
TotalEnergies SE 1.69% 0.68%
Rio Tinto PLC 0.80% 0.67%
Novartis AG 0.59% 0.88%
BHP Group Ltd 1.22% 0.58%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.52% 1.22%
Suncor Energy Inc 0.51% 0.53%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 0.50% 1.14%
Mitsubishi Corp 0.62% 0.45%
Equinor ASA 0.44% 1.20%
Allianz SE 0.43% 0.67%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.45% 0.41%
Only in FNDF
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 5.51%
SK hynix Inc 1.37%
Glencore PLC 1.22%
BP PLC 1.08%
Toyota Motor Corp 0.89%
Banco Santander SA 0.73%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.59%
British American Tobacco PLC 0.58%
Only in RODM
BOC Hong Kong Holdings Ltd 1.13%
ASML Holding NV 1.08%
GSK PLC 0.85%
Nokia Oyj 0.77%
Qantas Airways Ltd 0.48%
Ferrovial NV 0.45%
Yangzijiang Shipbuilding Holdings Ltd 0.42%
Takashimaya Co Ltd 0.42%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +28.5% +18.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +11.3 pts +1.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.29%
Already in the S&P 500 0.7% 0.0%
Holdings 889 336
Net assets, FNDF as of May 31, 2026 and RODM as of Jul 31, 2026 $24.6bn $1.6bn

FNDF and RODM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FNDF in plain words

FNDF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +28.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 1% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 889 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

RODM in plain words

RODM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 336 positions, with the top ten at 11.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDF or RODM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDF returned +28.5% and RODM +18.8%.
Which is cheaper, FNDF or RODM?
FNDF is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FNDF and RODM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 1% of FNDF and 0% of RODM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDF against RODM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndf-vs-rodm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.