BSCQ vs IBTG: Differences, Returns & Fees

BSCQ's duration was 0.3 years on May 31, 2026 and IBTG's 0.2 on Jul 31, 2026; IBTG charges 0.07% to BSCQ's 0.10%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $3.1bn for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF and $1.9bn for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BSCQ and IBTG

Answers cite the figures on this page.

IBTG costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; BSCQ is 1.6 times larger.

BSCQ vs IBTG: Differences, Returns & Fees
BSCQIBTG
Expense ratio0.10%0.07%
Net assets$3.1bn$1.9bn
Total return, 1 year+3.8%+3.6%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.8%
BSCQ total return, 1 year
+3.6%
IBTG total return, 1 year
0.10%
BSCQ expense ratio
0.07%
IBTG expense ratio

Get BSCQ and IBTG fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-C42751A582

BSCQ and IBTG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BSCQ follows not read by ETFIQ and IBTG follows ICE 2026 Maturity US Treasury Index.
  2. Number of holdings. BSCQ holds 64 positions and IBTG holds 10.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BSCQ returned +3.8% and IBTG +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
IBTG
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Treasury ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.8% +3.6%
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.07%
Holdings 64 10
Net assets $3.1bn $1.9bn

BSCQ and IBTG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCQ

BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

About IBTG

IBTG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or IBTG?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and IBTG +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, BSCQ or IBTG?
IBTG is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCQ against IBTG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-ibtg

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.