A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

BSCQ vs DUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

BSCQ's duration was 0.3 years on May 31, 2026 and DUSB's 0.9 on Jul 31, 2026; BSCQ charges 0.10% to DUSB's 0.15%. Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF, and $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BSCQ and DUSB

Answers cite the figures on this page.

BSCQ costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points.

BSCQ vs DUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
BSCQDUSB
Expense ratio0.10%0.15%
Net assets, BSCQ as of Oct 20, 2026 and DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026$3.1bn$2.2bn
Total return, 1 year+3.8%+3.6%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.8%
BSCQ total return, 1 year
+3.6%
DUSB total return, 1 year
0.10%
BSCQ expense ratio
0.15%
DUSB expense ratio

Get BSCQ's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-3B78A09D28

BSCQ and DUSB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BSCQ follows not read by ETFIQ and DUSB follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Number of holdings. BSCQ holds 64 positions and DUSB holds 564.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BSCQ returned +3.8% and DUSB +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Invesco Dimensional
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.8% +3.6%
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.15%
Holdings 64 564
Net assets, BSCQ as of Oct 20, 2026 and DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026 $3.1bn $2.2bn

BSCQ and DUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCQ

BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

About DUSB

DUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or DUSB?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and DUSB +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, BSCQ or DUSB?
BSCQ is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BSCQ vs CLIPBSCQ vs TBUXBSCQ vs XHLFBSCQ vs VRIGDUSB vs FLRNDUSB vs IBDRDUSB vs VNLADUSB vs TBLL
BSCQ on its own →DUSB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BSCQ dividend history →BSCQ holdings →DUSB dividend history →DUSB holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BSCQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BSCQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for BSCQ ↗DUSB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗DUSB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Dimensional website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCQ against DUSB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-dusb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.