BSCQ vs CLIP: Differences, Returns & Fees
On May 31, 2026 BSCQ's duration was 0.3 years and CLIP's 0.1; CLIP charges 0.07% to BSCQ's 0.10%. Net assets: $3.1bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF, and $2.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF.
CLIP costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; BSCQ is 1.4 times larger.
| BSCQ | CLIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.07% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $3.2bn | $2.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | +3.7% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
BSCQ and CLIP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BSCQ follows not read by ETFIQ and CLIP follows Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BSCQ returned +3.8% and CLIP +3.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.1 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BSCQ and CLIP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
BSCQ and CLIP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BSCQ
BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
About CLIP
CLIP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or CLIP?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and CLIP +3.7%.
- Which is cheaper, BSCQ or CLIP?
- CLIP is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSCQ against CLIP, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-clip
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BSCQ against CLIP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-clip
[BSCQ against CLIP (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-clip)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.