A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

CLIP vs DUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

CLIP's duration was 0.1 years on May 31, 2026 and DUSB's 0.9 on Jul 31, 2026; CLIP charges 0.07% to DUSB's 0.15%. Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about CLIP and DUSB

Answers cite the figures on this page.

CLIP costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points.

CLIP vs DUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
CLIPDUSB
Expense ratio0.07%0.15%
Net assets, CLIP as of Oct 12, 2026 and DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026$2.3bn$2.2bn
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+3.6%
What it tracksSolactive 1-3 month US T-Bill IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.7%
CLIP total return, 1 year
+3.6%
DUSB total return, 1 year
0.07%
CLIP expense ratio
0.15%
DUSB expense ratio

Get the week's ETF fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-3F6971CAAA

CLIP and DUSB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. CLIP follows Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index and DUSB follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Number of holdings. CLIP holds 25 positions and DUSB holds 564.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 CLIP returned +3.7% and DUSB +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.1 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Global X Dimensional
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +3.7% +3.6%
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.15%
Holdings 25 564
Net assets, CLIP as of Oct 12, 2026 and DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026 $2.3bn $2.2bn

CLIP and DUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About CLIP

CLIP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

About DUSB

DUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CLIP or DUSB?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CLIP returned +3.7% and DUSB +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, CLIP or DUSB?
CLIP is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BILZ vs CLIPBSCQ vs CLIPBILS vs CLIPBSCR vs CLIPBILS vs DUSBBIL vs DUSBBSCQ vs DUSBDUSB vs FLRN
CLIP on its own →DUSB on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →CLIP dividend history →CLIP holdings →DUSB dividend history →DUSB holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CLIP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CLIP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Global X page for CLIP ↗DUSB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗DUSB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Dimensional website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CLIP against DUSB, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/clip-vs-dusb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.