A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

BILZ vs CLIP: Differences, Returns & Fees

BILZ's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and CLIP's 0.1 on May 31, 2026; CLIP charges 0.07% to BILZ's 0.14%. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $2.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BILZ and CLIP

Answers cite the figures on this page.

CLIP costs 0.07 points a year less; both returned +3.7% over a year.

BILZ vs CLIP: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILZCLIP
Expense ratio0.14%0.07%
Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and CLIP as of Oct 12, 2026$1.0bn$2.3bn
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+3.7%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedSolactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+3.7%
BILZ total return, 1 year
+3.7%
CLIP total return, 1 year
0.14%
BILZ expense ratio
0.07%
CLIP expense ratio

Get the week's ETF fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-47B9371780

BILZ and CLIP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BILZ follows No index, actively managed and CLIP follows Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index.
  2. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BILZ returned +3.7% and CLIP +3.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.0 points.
  3. Cost (similar). BILZ charges 0.14% of assets a year and CLIP 0.07%, a gap of 0.07 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer PIMCO Global X
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.7% +3.7%
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.07%
Holdings not counted 25
Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and CLIP as of Oct 12, 2026 $1.0bn $2.3bn

BILZ and CLIP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BILZ

BILZ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

About CLIP

CLIP tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BILZ or CLIP?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILZ returned +3.7% and CLIP +3.7%.
Which is cheaper, BILZ or CLIP?
CLIP is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BILS vs BILZBIL vs BILZBILZ vs BSCQBILZ vs BSCRBILS vs CLIPBIL vs CLIPCLIP vs DUSBCLIP vs FLDR
BILZ on its own →CLIP on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BILZ dividend history →CLIP dividend history →CLIP holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BILZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BILZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗PIMCO website ↗CLIP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CLIP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Global X page for CLIP ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BILZ against CLIP, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-clip

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.