A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

DUSB vs FLRN: Differences, Returns & Fees

DUSB's duration was 0.9 years on Jul 31, 2026 and FLRN's 0.0 on Jun 30, 2026; both charge 0.15%. Net assets: $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF, and $3.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about DUSB and FLRN

Answers cite the figures on this page.

Both cost 0.15% a year; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; FLRN is 1.4 times larger.

DUSB vs FLRN: Differences, Returns & Fees
DUSBFLRN
Expense ratio0.15%0.15%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$2.2bn$3.1bn
Total return, 1 year+3.6%+4.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managednot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.6%
DUSB total return, 1 year
+4.3%
FLRN total return, 1 year
0.15%
DUSB expense ratio
0.15%
FLRN expense ratio

Get FLRN's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-A53C68F456

DUSB and FLRN are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. DUSB follows No index, actively managed and FLRN follows not read by ETFIQ.
  2. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 DUSB returned +3.6% and FLRN +4.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.7 points.
  3. Number of holdings (similar). DUSB holds 564 positions and FLRN holds 549.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

DUSB
Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF
FLRN
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Dimensional State Street
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.6% +4.3%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.15%
Holdings 564 549
Net assets, DUSB as of Jul 31, 2026 and FLRN as of Oct 20, 2026 $2.2bn $3.2bn

DUSB and FLRN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About DUSB

DUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

About FLRN

FLRN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DUSB or FLRN?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DUSB returned +3.6% and FLRN +4.3%.
Which is cheaper, DUSB or FLRN?
Neither: DUSB and FLRN both charge 0.15% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
DUSB vs FLOTDUSB vs VNLADUSB vs IBDRDUSB vs FLTRFLRN vs XHLFFLRN vs VRIGFLRN vs IBTGFLRN vs GBIL
DUSB on its own →FLRN on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →DUSB dividend history →DUSB holdings →FLRN dividend history →FLRN holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
DUSB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗DUSB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Dimensional website ↗FLRN filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FLRN prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DUSB against FLRN, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusb-vs-flrn

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.