FLRN vs FTSM: Differences, Returns & Fees

FLRN's duration was 0.0 years on Jun 30, 2026 and FTSM's 0.7 on Jul 31, 2026; FLRN charges 0.15% to FTSM's 0.29%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $3.2bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF and $6.7bn for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FLRN and FTSM

Answers cite the figures on this page.

FLRN costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; FTSM is 2.1 times larger.

FLRN vs FTSM: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLRNFTSM
Expense ratio0.15%0.29%
Net assets$3.2bn$6.7bn
Total return, 1 year+4.3%+3.4%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+4.3%
FLRN total return, 1 year
+3.4%
FTSM total return, 1 year
0.15%
FLRN expense ratio
0.29%
FTSM expense ratio

Get FLRN and FTSM fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-0738D08FBC

FLRN and FTSM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. FLRN follows not read by ETFIQ and FTSM follows No index, actively managed.
  2. Cost. FLRN charges 0.15% of assets a year and FTSM 0.29%, a gap of 0.14 points.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FLRN returned +4.3% and FTSM +3.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.9 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

FLRN
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
FTSM
First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +4.3% +3.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.9% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +5.4 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.29%
Holdings 549 740
Net assets $3.2bn $6.7bn

FLRN and FTSM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FLRN

FLRN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

About FTSM

FTSM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLRN or FTSM?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLRN returned +4.3% and FTSM +3.4%.
Which is cheaper, FLRN or FTSM?
FLRN is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLRN against FTSM, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flrn-vs-ftsm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.