FTSM vs VNLA: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 FTSM's duration was 0.7 years and VNLA's 0.8; VNLA charges 0.23% to FTSM's 0.29%. Net assets: $6.7bn on Oct 20, 2026 for First Trust Enhanced Short Maturity ETF, and $3.3bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF.
VNLA costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; FTSM is 1.9 times larger.
| FTSM | VNLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.23% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $6.5bn | $3.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.4% | +3.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
FTSM and VNLA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FTSM returned +3.4% and VNLA +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.2 points.
- Number of holdings (similar). FTSM holds 740 positions and VNLA holds 336.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
FTSM and VNLA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FTSM
FTSM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year.
About VNLA
VNLA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTSM or VNLA?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTSM returned +3.4% and VNLA +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FTSM or VNLA?
- VNLA is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTSM against VNLA, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftsm-vs-vnla
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FTSM against VNLA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftsm-vs-vnla
[FTSM against VNLA (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftsm-vs-vnla)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.