A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

FLRN vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees

FLRN's duration was 0.0 years on Jun 30, 2026 and GBIL's 0.4 on May 31, 2026; GBIL charges 0.12% to FLRN's 0.15%. Net assets: $3.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF, and $7.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about FLRN and GBIL

Answers cite the figures on this page.

GBIL costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; GBIL is 2.5 times larger.

FLRN vs GBIL: Differences, Returns & Fees
FLRNGBIL
Expense ratio0.15%0.12%
Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026$3.2bn$7.9bn
Total return, 1 year+4.3%+3.6%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+4.3%
FLRN total return, 1 year
+3.6%
GBIL total return, 1 year
0.15%
FLRN expense ratio
0.12%
GBIL expense ratio

Get FLRN's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-A901F783EC

FLRN and GBIL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Number of holdings. FLRN holds 549 positions and GBIL holds 43.
  2. What each follows (similar). Both follow not read by ETFIQ.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 FLRN returned +4.3% and GBIL +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.7 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

FLRN
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
GBIL
Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer State Street Goldman Sachs
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +4.3% +3.6%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.12%
Holdings 549 43
Net assets, FLRN as of Oct 20, 2026 and GBIL as of Oct 19, 2026 $3.2bn $7.9bn

FLRN and GBIL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FLRN

FLRN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

About GBIL

GBIL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.12% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FLRN or GBIL?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLRN returned +4.3% and GBIL +3.6%.
Which is cheaper, FLRN or GBIL?
GBIL is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
FLRN vs FTSMFLRN vs PULSFLRN vs SHVFLRN vs TBUXGBIL vs VNLAGBIL vs IBDRFLTR vs GBILGBIL vs TBLL
FLRN on its own →GBIL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →FLRN dividend history →FLRN holdings →GBIL dividend history →GBIL holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
FLRN filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FLRN prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗GBIL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗GBIL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Goldman Sachs website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FLRN against GBIL, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/flrn-vs-gbil

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.