DUSB vs VNLA: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 DUSB's duration was 0.9 years and VNLA's 0.8; DUSB charges 0.15% to VNLA's 0.23%. Net assets on Jul 31, 2026: $2.2bn for Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF and $3.3bn for Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF.
DUSB costs 0.08 points a year less; both returned +3.6% over a year; VNLA is 1.5 times larger.
| DUSB | VNLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.23% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $2.2bn | $3.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.6% | +3.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
DUSB and VNLA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 1% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 DUSB returned +3.6% and VNLA +3.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.0 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DUSB and VNLA hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
1% in common
On the same fields
DUSB and VNLA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DUSB
DUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
About VNLA
VNLA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DUSB or VNLA?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DUSB returned +3.6% and VNLA +3.6%.
- Which is cheaper, DUSB or VNLA?
- DUSB is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DUSB against VNLA, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusb-vs-vnla
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). DUSB against VNLA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusb-vs-vnla
[DUSB against VNLA (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dusb-vs-vnla)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.