BSCQ vs FLRN: Differences, Returns & Fees
BSCQ's duration was 0.3 years on May 31, 2026 and FLRN's 0.0 on Jun 30, 2026; BSCQ charges 0.10% to FLRN's 0.15%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $3.1bn for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF and $3.2bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF.
BSCQ costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points.
| BSCQ | FLRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.15% |
| Net assets | $3.1bn | $3.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.8% | +4.3% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
BSCQ and FLRN are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Number of holdings. BSCQ holds 64 positions and FLRN holds 549.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow not read by ETFIQ.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BSCQ returned +3.8% and FLRN +4.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.5 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
BSCQ and FLRN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BSCQ
BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
About FLRN
FLRN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or FLRN?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and FLRN +4.3%.
- Which is cheaper, BSCQ or FLRN?
- BSCQ is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BSCQ against FLRN, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-flrn
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BSCQ against FLRN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-flrn
[BSCQ against FLRN (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-flrn)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.