BSCQ vs FLRN: Differences, Returns & Fees

BSCQ's duration was 0.3 years on May 31, 2026 and FLRN's 0.0 on Jun 30, 2026; BSCQ charges 0.10% to FLRN's 0.15%. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $3.1bn for Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF and $3.2bn for State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BSCQ and FLRN

Answers cite the figures on this page.

BSCQ costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points.

BSCQ vs FLRN: Differences, Returns & Fees
BSCQFLRN
Expense ratio0.10%0.15%
Net assets$3.1bn$3.2bn
Total return, 1 year+3.8%+4.3%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+3.8%
BSCQ total return, 1 year
+4.3%
FLRN total return, 1 year
0.10%
BSCQ expense ratio
0.15%
FLRN expense ratio

Get BSCQ and FLRN fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-31A681FB29

BSCQ and FLRN are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Number of holdings. BSCQ holds 64 positions and FLRN holds 549.
  2. What each follows (similar). Both follow not read by ETFIQ.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BSCQ returned +3.8% and FLRN +4.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.5 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BSCQ
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF
FLRN
State Street SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.8% +4.3%
Expense ratio 0.10% 0.15%
Holdings 64 549
Net assets $3.1bn $3.2bn

BSCQ and FLRN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BSCQ

BSCQ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

About FLRN

FLRN tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSCQ or FLRN?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSCQ returned +3.8% and FLRN +4.3%.
Which is cheaper, BSCQ or FLRN?
BSCQ is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BSCQ against FLRN, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bscq-vs-flrn

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.