Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs FNDX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to FNDX's +23.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and FNDX

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FNDX costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.3 points.

BOND vs FNDX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDFNDX
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+23.9%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFundamental U.S. Large Company
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.25%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026$8.3bn$27.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight88%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and FNDX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND FNDX
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in FNDX
Apple Inc 4.46%
Microsoft Corp 2.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO Schwab
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +23.9%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +13.1% (IWB)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG +10.8 pts vs IWB
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.25%
Holdings 1565 731
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 $8.3bn $27.6bn

BOND and FNDX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FNDX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and FNDX +23.9%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or FNDX?
FNDX is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against FNDX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-fndx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.