Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to VUSB's +3.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and VUSB

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $9.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
+3.5%
VUSB total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.10%
VUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VUSB costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.4 points.

FNDX vs VUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXVUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%+3.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.10%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026$27.6bn$9.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight88%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX VUSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Apple Inc 4.46%
Microsoft Corp 2.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Only in VUSB
United States Treasury Bill 2.39%
United States Treasury Bill 2.35%
MKTLIQ 2.00%
Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.89%
PNC Financial Services Group Inc 0.53%
National Bank of Canada 0.53%
Citizens Bank NA/Providence RI 0.48%
US Bancorp 0.47%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +23.9% +3.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB +4.9 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.10%
Holdings 731 1344
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and VUSB as of Sep 30, 2026 $27.6bn $9.9bn

FNDX and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

VUSB

VUSB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +3.5% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or VUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and VUSB +3.5%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or VUSB?
VUSB is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against VUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-vusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.