Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs USFR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to USFR's +4.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and USFR
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $17.0bn on May 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund.
Pair scorecard
USFR costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.8 points.
| Measure | FNDX | USFR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +4.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and USFR as of May 31, 2026 | $27.6bn | $17.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 88% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and USFR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and USFR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
USFR
USFR tracks an index of Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or USFR?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and USFR +4.1%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or USFR?
- USFR is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against USFR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-usfr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against USFR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-usfr
[FNDX against USFR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-usfr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.