Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SHV?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and SHV returned +3.6%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FNDX or SHV?

FNDX charges 0.25% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FNDX vs SHV: how they differ

FNDX and SHV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FNDX	Only in SHV
Apple Inc 4.64%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 1.04%
Intel Corp 2.57%	TREASURY NOTE 0.47%
Alphabet Inc 2.38%	TREASURY BILL 0.06%
Microsoft Corp 2.33%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%
Alphabet Inc 1.90%
Amazon.com Inc 1.86%
Micron Technology Inc 1.60%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

FNDX and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Schwab	iShares
What it is	Fundamental U.S. Large Company	0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year	+26.1%	+3.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+8.6 pts	−13.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.15%
Holdings	733	66

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SHV?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +26.1% and SHV returned +3.6%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or SHV?: FNDX charges 0.25% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FNDX against SHV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FNDX against SHV, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-shv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources