Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs PULS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to PULS's +4.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and PULS
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $19.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
PULS costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.9 points.
| Measure | FNDX | PULS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +4.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and PULS as of Oct 27, 2026 | $27.6bn | $19.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 88% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
PULS
PULS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or PULS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and PULS +4.0%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or PULS?
- PULS is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against PULS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-puls
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against PULS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-puls
[FNDX against PULS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-puls)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.