Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BOND vs FDVV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to FDVV's +13.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BOND and FDVV
Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF.
Pair scorecard
FDVV costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.9 points.
| Measure | BOND | FDVV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −1.4% | +13.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Fidelity High Dividend Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and FDVV as of Sep 30, 2026 | $8.3bn | $10.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 87% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Sep 23, 2016 to Oct 23, 2026 · 526 weekly returnsFDVV returned more: +247.7% to +19.5%. BOND swung less: 5.4% to 16.9%. BOND fell less at its worst: −19.5% to −37.4%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BOND | FDVV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +19.5% | +247.7% | FDVV | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +1.8% | +13.1% | FDVV | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −17.8% | +143.5% | FDVV | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 5.4% | 16.9% | BOND | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 4.0% | 12.1% | BOND | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −19.5% | −37.4% | BOND | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.11 | 0.67 | FDVV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.15 | 0.93 | FDVV | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.09 | 0.35 | FDVV | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 526 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BOND and FDVV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
BOND and FDVV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BOND and FDVV do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. BOND follows No index, actively managed and FDVV follows Fidelity High Dividend Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BOND returned −1.4% and FDVV +13.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 14.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BOND
BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FDVV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and FDVV +13.5%.
- Which is cheaper, BOND or FDVV?
- FDVV is cheaper, by 0.39 percentage points a year. That is about $39 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BOND against FDVV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-fdvv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BOND against FDVV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-fdvv
[BOND against FDVV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-fdvv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.