Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs CGDV: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to CGDV's +15.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and CGDV

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CGDV costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.2 points.

BOND vs CGDV: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDCGDV
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+15.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20263.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.33%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$39.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight92%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and CGDV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND CGDV
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in CGDV
Microsoft Corp 7.64%
NVIDIA Corp 6.32%
Broadcom Inc 4.67%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27%
Alphabet Inc 3.55%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 3.49%
Oracle Corp 3.22%
RTX Corp 3.16%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +15.8%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +27.5% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG −11.7 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.33%
Holdings 1565 53
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $39.1bn

BOND and CGDV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or CGDV?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and CGDV +15.8%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or CGDV?
CGDV is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against CGDV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-cgdv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.