Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs VYM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to VYM's +18.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and VYM

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $78.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+18.0%
VYM total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.04%
VYM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VYM costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.4 points.

BOND vs VYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDVYM
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+18.0%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedFTSE High Dividend Yield Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.04%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VYM as of Sep 30, 2026$8.3bn$78.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight90%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 9, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 763 weekly returns
BOND VYM
Return
Total return edge VYM +47.4% +430.4%
Annualized edge VYM +2.7% +12.0%
Price return edge VYM −12.6% +238.7%
Risk
Volatility edge BOND 4.9% 14.5%
Max drawdown edge BOND −19.5% −32.4%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge VYM 0.21 0.74
Sortino edge VYM 0.28 1.04
Calmar edge VYM 0.14 0.37
Reading

VYM returned more: +430.4% to +47.4%. BOND swung less: 4.9% to 14.5%. BOND fell less at its worst: −19.5% to −32.4%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BOND vs VYM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDVYMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+47.4%+430.4%VYMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.7%+12.0%VYMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−12.6%+238.7%VYMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.9%14.5%BONDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.6%10.3%BONDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.5%−32.4%BONDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.210.74VYMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.281.04VYMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.140.37VYMAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 763 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and VYM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND VYM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in VYM
Broadcom Inc 6.93%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.75%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.84%
Johnson & Johnson 2.71%
AbbVie Inc 1.96%
Cisco Systems Inc 1.80%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Caterpillar Inc 1.56%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of US high dividend
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +18.0%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.04%
Holdings 1565 595
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and VYM as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.3bn $78.9bn

BOND and VYM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-08A184103A

BOND and VYM do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. BOND follows No index, actively managed and VYM follows FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BOND returned −1.4% and VYM +18.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 19.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VYM

VYM tracks an index of US high dividend. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 595 positions, with the top ten at 26.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or VYM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and VYM +18.0%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or VYM?
VYM is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against VYM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-vym

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.