Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGDV vs VGLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to VGLT's −6.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGDV and VGLT
Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $10.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF.
Pair scorecard
VGLT costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.5 points; CGDV is 3.7 times larger.
| Measure | CGDV | VGLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +15.8% | −6.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 38.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $38.4bn | $10.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 92% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and VGLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGDV and VGLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VGLT
VGLT tracks an index of Long-term Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −6.7% with distributions reinvested, against −6.7% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 38.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or VGLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and VGLT −6.7%.
- Which is cheaper, CGDV or VGLT?
- VGLT is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGDV against VGLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-vglt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGDV against VGLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-vglt
[CGDV against VGLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-vglt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.