Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

FNDX vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to IUSB's −1.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FNDX and IUSB

Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $49.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

At a glance
+23.9%
FNDX total return, 1 year
−1.2%
IUSB total return, 1 year
0.25%
FNDX expense ratio
0.06%
IUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IUSB costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.1 points.

FNDX vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureFNDXIUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+23.9%−1.2%
Benchmark
What it tracksFundamental U.S. Large CompanyBloomberg U.S. Universal Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.06%
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and IUSB as of Oct 27, 2026$27.6bn$49.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight88%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FNDX IUSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FNDX
Apple Inc 4.46%
Microsoft Corp 2.82%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 2.42%
Amazon.com Inc 1.80%
Alphabet Inc 1.78%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.63%
Chevron Corp 1.61%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
Only in IUSB
BLK Liquidity Temp Cash Inst #21 4.75%
TREASURY NOTE 0.49%
TREASURY NOTE 0.42%
TREASURY NOTE 0.41%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
TREASURY NOTE 0.37%
TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 0.36%
UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.35%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company Tracks an index of Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year +23.9% −1.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.1% (IWB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +10.8 pts vs IWB not measured
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.06%
Holdings 731 18338
Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and IUSB as of Oct 27, 2026 $27.6bn $49.8bn

FNDX and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IUSB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FNDX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.

IUSB

IUSB tracks an index of Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or IUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and IUSB −1.2%.
Which is cheaper, FNDX or IUSB?
IUSB is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FNDX against IUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-iusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.