Which returned more over the last year, BOND or EMXC?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and EMXC returned +55.5%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or EMXC?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and EMXC charges 0.25%, so EMXC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs EMXC: how they differ

BOND and EMXC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and EMXC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in EMXC
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 18.85%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 9.26%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	SK HYNIX 7.53%
United States Treasury 2.93%	MEDIATEK 2.12%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.20%
United States Treasury 2.22%	DELTA ELECTRONICS 1.02%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 0.96%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	HDFC BANK 0.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

BOND and EMXC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	iShares
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	MSCI Emerging Markets ex China
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+55.5%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	+38.0 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.25%
Holdings	1565	597

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

EMXC in plain words

EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 597 positions, with the top ten at 43.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or EMXC?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and EMXC returned +55.5%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or EMXC?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and EMXC charges 0.25%, so EMXC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against EMXC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against EMXC, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-emxc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources