Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or VUSB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +55.5% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMXC or VUSB?

EMXC charges 0.25% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMXC vs VUSB: how they differ

EMXC and VUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMXC	Only in VUSB
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 18.85%	United States Treasury Bill 4.24%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 9.26%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.68%
SK HYNIX 7.53%	PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 0.59%
MEDIATEK 2.12%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.53%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.20%	Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.52%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 1.02%	US Bancorp 0.51%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 0.96%	Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.50%
HDFC BANK 0.81%	Truist Bank 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

EMXC and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	MSCI Emerging Markets ex China	Ultra-Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+55.5%	+3.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+38.0 pts	−13.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.10%
Holdings	597	1281

EMXC in plain words

EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 597 positions, with the top ten at 43.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VUSB in plain words

VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or VUSB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +55.5% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or VUSB?: EMXC charges 0.25% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMXC against VUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMXC against VUSB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-vusb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources