Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to IEMG's +15.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and IEMG

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $150.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+15.3%
IEMG total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.09%
IEMG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IEMG costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 16.7 points.

BOND vs IEMG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDIEMG
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+15.3%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 202610.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI)
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.09%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and IEMG as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$150.4bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund32.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and IEMG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND IEMG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in IEMG
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 14.03%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.05%
SK HYNIX 4.31%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.32%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.60%
MEDIATEK 1.36%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.83%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.80%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +15.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +16.3% (EEM)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG −1.0 pts vs EEM
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.09%
Holdings 1565 2857
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and IEMG as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $150.4bn

BOND and IEMG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IEMG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IEMG

IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,857 positions, with the top ten at 32.7%. It sat 10.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or IEMG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and IEMG +15.3%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or IEMG?
IEMG is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against IEMG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-iemg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.