Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs EEM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to EEM's +16.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and EEM

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $29.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+16.3%
EEM total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.72%
EEM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

BOND costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 17.7 points.

BOND vs EEM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDEEM
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+16.3%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 202610.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI Emerging Markets Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.72%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and EEM as of Oct 27, 2026$8.3bn$29.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 9, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 763 weekly returns
BOND EEM
Return
Total return edge EEM +47.4% +93.5%
Annualized edge EEM +2.7% +4.6%
Price return edge EEM −12.6% +41.6%
Risk
Volatility edge BOND 4.9% 18.7%
Max drawdown edge BOND −19.5% −39.1%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge EEM 0.21 0.24
Sortino edge EEM 0.28 0.34
Calmar edge BOND 0.14 0.12
Reading

EEM returned more: +93.5% to +47.4%. BOND swung less: 4.9% to 18.7%. BOND fell less at its worst: −19.5% to −39.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BOND vs EEM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDEEMEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+47.4%+93.5%EEMPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.7%+4.6%EEMTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−12.6%+41.6%EEMPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.9%18.7%BONDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.6%13.3%BONDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.5%−39.1%BONDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.210.24EEMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.280.34EEMReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.140.12BONDAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 763 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and EEM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND EEM
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in EEM
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 15.98%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 6.88%
SK HYNIX 4.91%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 2.64%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 1.82%
MEDIATEK 1.54%
CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.94%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.91%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO iShares
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Emerging markets
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +16.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.72%
Holdings 1565 1186
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and EEM as of Oct 27, 2026 $8.3bn $29.1bn

BOND and EEM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

EEM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EEM

EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or EEM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and EEM +16.3%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or EEM?
BOND is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against EEM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-eem

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.