Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to IUSB's −1.2%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and IUSB

Net assets: $26.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF, and $49.8bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
−1.2%
IUSB total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.06%
IUSB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IUSB costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 35.0 points; IUSB is 1.9 times larger.

EMXC vs IUSB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCIUSB
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%−1.2%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexBloomberg U.S. Universal Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.06%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$26.4bn$49.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC IUSB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
Only in IUSB
BLK Liquidity Temp Cash Inst #21 4.75%
TREASURY NOTE 0.49%
TREASURY NOTE 0.42%
TREASURY NOTE 0.41%
TREASURY NOTE 0.38%
TREASURY NOTE 0.37%
TREASURY NOTE (2OLD) 0.36%
UMBS 15YR TBA(REG B) 0.35%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Tracks an index of Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year +33.8% −1.2%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX not measured
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.06%
Holdings 696 18338
Net assets, EMXC as of Oct 28, 2026 and IUSB as of Oct 27, 2026 $26.9bn $49.8bn

EMXC and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EMXC and IUSB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

IUSB

IUSB tracks an index of Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or IUSB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and IUSB −1.2%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or IUSB?
IUSB is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against IUSB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-iusb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.