Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EMXC vs JAAA: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMXC returned +33.8% to JAAA's +4.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EMXC and JAAA

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $26.9bn for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and $32.5bn for Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF.

At a glance
+33.8%
EMXC total return, 1 year
+4.7%
JAAA total return, 1 year
0.25%
EMXC expense ratio
0.20%
JAAA expense ratio

Pair scorecard

JAAA costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 29.1 points; JAAA is 1.2 times larger.

EMXC vs JAAA: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEMXCJAAA
Return
Total return, 1 year+33.8%+4.7%
Drawdown
Below its high11.3%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Emerging Markets ex China IndexNo index, actively managed
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.20%
Net assets$26.9bn$32.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and JAAA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EMXC JAAA
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EMXC
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 19.91%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 8.58%
SK HYNIX 6.12%
MEDIATEK 1.92%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 1.14%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY 1.02%
DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.99%
HDFC BANK 0.89%
Only in JAAA
KKR CLO 35 Ltd. 0.85%
AB BSL CLO 1 Ltd. 0.79%
Anchorage Capital CLO 16 Ltd. 0.73%
Palmer Square CLO Ltd. 0.69%
Ares LXI CLO Ltd. 0.68%
Carlyle US CLO Ltd. 0.62%
WISE CLO Ltd. 0.62%
Carlyle US CLO Ltd. 0.60%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +33.8% +4.7%
Its benchmark over the same days +37.0% (KEMX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −3.2 pts vs KEMX not measured
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.20%
Holdings 696 598
Net assets $26.9bn $32.5bn

EMXC and JAAA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EMXC flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EMXC

EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +33.8% with distributions reinvested, against +37.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 696 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%. It sat 11.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

JAAA

JAAA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or JAAA?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +33.8% and JAAA +4.7%.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or JAAA?
JAAA is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EMXC against JAAA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emxc-vs-jaaa

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.