A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

BILZ vs FLTR: Differences, Returns & Fees

BILZ's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and FLTR's 0.0 on Jul 31, 2026; both charge 0.14%. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $3.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF.

Ask IQ about this page

Ask IQ about BILZ and FLTR

Answers cite the figures on this page.

Both cost 0.14% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point.

BILZ vs FLTR: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILZFLTR
Expense ratio0.14%0.14%
Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and FLTR as of Oct 19, 2026$1.0bn$3.6bn
Total return, 1 year+3.7%+4.7%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index
Holdings in commonreport dates differ

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+3.7%
BILZ total return, 1 year
+4.7%
FLTR total return, 1 year
0.14%
BILZ expense ratio
0.14%
FLTR expense ratio

Get FLTR's fund flows by email, every Monday.

Plus the Friday ETF note. Confirm from the link that arrives, and unsubscribe in one click. See Privacy.

Client brief · page 1 of 2Report BR-6D265C40DF

BILZ and FLTR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. BILZ follows No index, actively managed and FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index.
  2. Size. BILZ has $1.0bn in net assets and FLTR $3.6bn (net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and FLTR as of Oct 19, 2026); FLTR is 3.6 times larger.
  3. One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BILZ returned +3.7% and FLTR +4.7% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.0 points.

Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.

Take this comparison to a client

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.

On the same fields

BILZ
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Bond ETF
Issuer PIMCO VanEck
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +3.7% +4.7%
Expense ratio 0.14% 0.14%
Holdings not counted 455
Net assets, BILZ as of Jun 30, 2026 and FLTR as of Oct 19, 2026 $1.0bn $3.6bn

BILZ and FLTR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About BILZ

BILZ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.

About FLTR

FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BILZ or FLTR?
In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILZ returned +3.7% and FLTR +4.7%.
Which is cheaper, BILZ or FLTR?
Neither: BILZ and FLTR both charge 0.14% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BILZ vs VNLABILZ vs GSYBILZ vs IBDSBILZ vs FLRNFLTR vs VGUSFLTR vs RAVIFLTR vs YEARFLTR vs GSST
BILZ on its own →FLTR on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →BILZ dividend history →FLTR dividend history →FLTR holdings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
BILZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BILZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗PIMCO website ↗FLTR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FLTR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BILZ against FLTR, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-fltr

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.