FLTR vs RAVI: Differences, Returns & Fees
On Jul 31, 2026 FLTR's duration was 0.0 years and RAVI's 0.5; FLTR charges 0.14% to RAVI's 0.25%. Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 19, 2026 for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, and $1.5bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Northern Trust Ultra-Short Fixed Income ETF.
FLTR costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.9 points; FLTR is 2.0 times larger.
| FLTR | RAVI | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $3.0bn | $1.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.7% | +3.8% |
| What it tracks | MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
FLTR and RAVI are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FLTR follows MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index and RAVI follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 14% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026).
- Cost. FLTR charges 0.14% of assets a year and RAVI 0.25%, a gap of 0.11 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FLTR and RAVI hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
14% in common
On the same fields
FLTR and RAVI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FLTR
FLTR tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About RAVI
RAVI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FLTR or RAVI?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FLTR returned +4.7% and RAVI +3.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FLTR or RAVI?
- FLTR is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FLTR against RAVI, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-ravi
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). FLTR against RAVI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-ravi
[FLTR against RAVI (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fltr-vs-ravi)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.