BILZ vs IBDS: Differences, Returns & Fees
BILZ's duration was 0.2 years on Jun 30, 2026 and IBDS's 0.8 on Jul 31, 2026; IBDS charges 0.10% to BILZ's 0.14%. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund, and $4.0bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF.
IBDS costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; IBDS is 3.7 times larger.
| BILZ | IBDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.10% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.0bn | $3.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +3.3% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | report dates differ | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
BILZ and IBDS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. BILZ follows No index, actively managed and IBDS follows not read by ETFIQ.
- Size. BILZ has $1.0bn in net assets and IBDS $3.8bn (net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026); IBDS is 3.8 times larger.
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 BILZ returned +3.7% and IBDS +3.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 0.4 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
On the same fields
BILZ and IBDS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About BILZ
BILZ is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year.
About IBDS
IBDS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BILZ or IBDS?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BILZ returned +3.7% and IBDS +3.3%.
- Which is cheaper, BILZ or IBDS?
- IBDS is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BILZ against IBDS, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-ibds
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). BILZ against IBDS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-ibds
[BILZ against IBDS (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bilz-vs-ibds)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.