BAFE vs OEF: Differences, Returns & Fees
BAFE and OEF hold 31% of their weight in the same names, and OEF returned +16.8% over the year. Net assets: $1.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF, and $20.8bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares S&P 100 ETF.
OEF costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.5 points; OEF is 11.9 times larger.
| BAFE | OEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.7bn | $20.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.3% | +16.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | S&P 100 |
| Holdings in common | 31% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.2% | 52.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BAFE and OEF hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
31% in common
On the same fields
BAFE and OEF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BAFE in plain words
BAFE is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 44 positions, with the top ten at 42.2%.
OEF in plain words
OEF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BAFE or OEF?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BAFE returned +12.3% and OEF +16.8%.
- Which is cheaper, BAFE or OEF?
- OEF is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BAFE against OEF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-oef
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BAFE against OEF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-oef
[BAFE against OEF (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bafe-vs-oef)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.