Six benchmarks at 95% stocks, side by side
The six ETFIQ benchmarks that hold 95% stocks, one per family, on the same rows: five portfolios, with Strategic 95 as the reference column. Every figure is the benchmark’s own, dated; the period returns, risk and drawdowns cover the common period, Sep 30, 2016 to Sep 30, 2026, the longest window all six publish.
Over 10 years to Sep 30, 2026, 3 of 5 ETFIQ benchmarks at 95% stocks beat Strategic 95’s +11.78% a year, hypothetical.
One sentence, recomputed every trading night. A benchmark is a rule, not a recommendation.
Comparison grid
Six benchmarks at 95% stocks · common period Sep 30, 2016 to Sep 30, 2026Eight row groups: facts, period returns, calendar years, risk, drawdowns, exposures, costs, rule. Each benchmark keeps one colour on every chart and header, its name always in text; the reference is last, in grey. Exposures are percent of the portfolio, seen through each fund’s filings. First column sticky; the table scrolls in its own box.
| Tax-aware 95 | Factor 95 | Income 95 | Tactical 95 | Thematic 95 | Strategic 95, the reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facts | ||||||
| Band | over 85 | over 85 | over 85 | over 85 | over 85 | over 85 |
| Stock share | 94.04% | 94.81% | 94.87% | 94.04% | 95.00% | 94.04% |
| Fee | 0.06% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.52% | 0.06% |
| History | tracked from Oct 2026 | tracked from Oct 2026 | tracked from Oct 2026 | tracked from Oct 2026 | tracked from Oct 2026 | tracked from Oct 2026 |
| As of | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 7, 2026 | Oct 7, 2026 |
| Period returns · common period | ||||||
| 1 year* | +15.47% | +21.73% | +14.50% | +15.66% | +14.68% | +15.49% |
| 3 years, annualised* | +20.46% | +21.98% | +15.44% | +15.33% | +25.04% | +20.54% |
| Common period, annualised* | +11.80% | +12.82% | +9.62% | +9.76% | +14.70% | +11.78% |
| Calendar years | ||||||
| 2026 to Oct 7, 2026* | +13.19% | +20.89% | +11.04% | +13.44% | +12.19% | +13.27% |
| 2025* | +21.44% | +16.23% | +11.52% | +15.06% | +38.18% | +21.64% |
| 2024* | +15.70% | +17.53% | +17.94% | +15.63% | +10.77% | +15.70% |
| 2023* | +21.20% | +16.05% | +8.97% | +3.55% | +25.99% | +21.17% |
| 2022* | −17.49% | −15.65% | −6.53% | −6.99% | −23.91% | −17.73% |
| 2021* | +17.38% | +20.45% | +21.81% | +17.11% | +14.78% | +17.21% |
| 2020* | +16.16% | +14.03% | +0.79% | +16.42% | +44.87% | +16.31% |
| 2019* | +25.82% | +27.83% | +22.17% | +6.79% | +26.03% | +25.90% |
| 2018* | −9.20% | −4.97% | −5.72% | −2.42% | −11.73% | −9.25% |
| 2017* | +23.44% | +22.19% | +15.90% | +23.28% | +29.29% | +23.36% |
| Risk · common period | ||||||
| Volatility* | 14.22% | 14.90% | 11.77% | 10.12% | 19.23% | 14.20% |
| Sharpe on T-bills* | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.63 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| Beta to the reference* | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.76 | 0.49 | 1.27 | not published |
| Down capture* | 100.00% | 99.29% | 75.57% | 59.61% | 127.48% | not published |
| Drawdowns | ||||||
| Maximum drawdown* | −33.11% | −34.81% | −33.23% | −14.69% | −35.23% | −32.74% |
| Dates* | Feb 12 to Mar 23, 2020 | Feb 19 to Mar 23, 2020 | Feb 12 to Mar 23, 2020 | Jan 2018 to Aug 2019 | Feb 19 to Mar 18, 2020 | Feb 12 to Mar 23, 2020 |
| Worst month* | −14.19% (Mar 2020) | −14.21% (Mar 2020) | −14.57% (Mar 2020) | −7.42% (Oct 2018) | −15.51% (Mar 2020) | −14.07% (Mar 2020) |
| Exposures | ||||||
| Stocks | 94.04% | 94.81% | 94.87% | 94.04% | 95.00% | 94.04% |
| Preferred shares | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| Bonds | 4.95% | 4.93% | 4.92% | 4.98% | 4.93% | 4.93% |
| Funds | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Other, including cash | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.21% | 0.73% | 0.07% | 0.78% |
| U.S. stocks | 58.52% | 91.47% | 47.37% | 58.52% | not published | 58.52% |
| Non-U.S. stocks | 35.53% | 3.34% | 0.00% | 35.53% | not published | 35.53% |
| Municipal bonds | 4.95% | not published | not published | not published | not published | not published |
| Government bonds | not published | 3.46% | 1.73% | not published | 3.46% | 3.46% |
| Corporate bonds | not published | 1.33% | 0.67% | not published | 1.33% | 1.33% |
| Costs | ||||||
| Fund fees, weighted | 0.06% | 0.12% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.52% | 0.06% |
| A year on $10,000 | $6 | $12 | $31 | $6 | $52 | $6 |
| Rule | ||||||
| Rebalance | monthly | monthly | monthly | monthly, by trend test | quarterly; themes yearly | monthly |
| Holdings | 2 ETFs | 7 ETFs | 5 ETFs | 2 ETFs | 41 ETFs | 3 ETFs |
| Change log | none since 2015 | none since 2013 | none since 2013 | 48 changes since 2010 | 13 changes since 2011 | none since 2010 |
*Hypothetical: the figures in the row start before Oct 5, 2026, when the tracked record starts (ETFIQ froze the rules on Oct 3, 2026), so they apply today’s rule and funds to earlier prices. Not published: the reference’s beta and down capture. Strategic 95 is measured against itself. Not published: Thematic 95’s U.S. stocks, Thematic 95’s Non-U.S. stocks. No held fund with stocks publishes a US share of its stocks. Not published: Factor 95’s municipal bonds, Income 95’s municipal bonds, Tactical 95’s municipal bonds, Thematic 95’s municipal bonds. No held fund with bonds publishes a municipal share of its bonds. Not published: Tax-aware 95’s government bonds, Tactical 95’s government bonds. No held fund with bonds publishes a government share of its bonds. Not published: Tax-aware 95’s corporate bonds, Tactical 95’s corporate bonds. No held fund with bonds publishes a corporate share of its bonds.
Overlap matrix
Books May 29 to Oct 7, 2026Pairwise weight overlap in percent of the portfolio: for each pair, the smaller of the two shares of every security both hold, added up, matched by the books' row key. A holding with no security id cannot be matched, so each figure is a floor; the share of each portfolio matched: Tax-aware 95 72.68%; Factor 95 21.51%; Income 95 48.18%; Tactical 95 67.70%; Thematic 95 46.64%; Strategic 95 70.15%. Ink flips to dark above 50%.
Holdings matrix
Top 10 securities across the six · May 29 to Oct 7, 2026| Security | Tax-aware | Factor | Income | Tactical | Thematic | Strategic | Held by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 4.10% | · | · | 4.10% | 0.58% | 4.10% | 4 of 6 |
| Apple Inc | 3.65% | · | · | 3.65% | 0.14% | 3.65% | 4 of 6 |
| Microsoft Corp | 3.00% | · | · | 3.00% | 0.23% | 3.00% | 4 of 6 |
| Broadcom Inc. | 1.37% | · | 3.30% | 1.37% | 0.31% | 1.37% | 5 of 6 |
| Amazon.com, Inc. | 2.01% | · | · | 2.01% | 0.55% | 2.01% | 4 of 6 |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | 1.60% | · | · | 1.60% | 0.23% | 1.60% | 4 of 6 |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 0.76% | · | 1.82% | 0.76% | 0.02% | 0.76% | 5 of 6 |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | 1.25% | · | · | 1.25% | 0.24% | 1.25% | 4 of 6 |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) | 1.00% | · | · | 1.00% | 0.61% | 1.00% | 4 of 6 |
| TESLA INC | 0.86% | · | · | 0.86% | 0.40% | 0.86% | 4 of 6 |
The six through each stress window
Published list · prices to each window’s endThe windows are found, never chosen, by the stress windows rule, version 1: every fall of VT of 10% or more and of AGG of 5% or more since Jan 4, 2010, from its peak close to its trough close. One small chart per window, all six on one scale from $10,000, and the table of return over the window in percent and in dollars with the maximum drawdown inside it. A window outside a benchmark’s history shows the gap, never a number. *Hypothetical: the window starts before Oct 5, 2026.
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | −15.87% | $8,413 | −15.87% |
| Factor | −16.40% | $8,360 | −16.48% |
| Income | −14.16% | $8,584 | −14.36% |
| Tactical | −5.44% | $9,456 | −6.75% |
| Thematic | −21.42% | $7,858 | −21.42% |
| Strategic | −15.69% | $8,431 | −15.69% |
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | −25.60% | $7,440 | −25.60% |
| Factor | −23.05% | $7,695 | −23.76% |
| Income | −13.07% | $8,693 | −16.70% |
| Tactical | −3.99% | $9,601 | −8.55% |
| Thematic | −33.42% | $6,658 | −33.42% |
| Strategic | −25.85% | $7,415 | −25.85% |
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | +4.19% | $10,419 | −25.60% |
| Factor | +9.63% | $10,963 | −23.76% |
| Income | +18.46% | $11,846 | −16.70% |
| Tactical | +31.69% | $13,169 | −8.55% |
| Thematic | +6.38% | $10,638 | −34.38% |
| Strategic | +3.62% | $10,362 | −25.87% |
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | −21.89% | $7,811 | −21.89% |
| Factor | −21.12% | $7,888 | −21.12% |
| Income | −19.13% | $8,087 | −19.55% |
| Tactical | −0.34% | $9,966 | −0.38% |
| Thematic | −26.59% | $7,341 | −26.59% |
| Strategic | −21.70% | $7,830 | −21.70% |
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | −33.11% | $6,689 | −33.11% |
| Factor | −34.61% | $6,539 | −34.81% |
| Income | −33.23% | $6,677 | −33.23% |
| Tactical | −8.09% | $9,191 | −10.44% |
| Thematic | −34.59% | $6,541 | −35.23% |
| Strategic | −32.74% | $6,726 | −32.74% |
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | −18.96% | $8,104 | −18.96% |
| Factor | −15.78% | $8,422 | −19.06% |
| Income | −14.23% | $8,577 | −16.18% |
| Tactical | −8.80% | $9,120 | −12.38% |
| Thematic | −20.69% | $7,931 | −20.69% |
| Strategic | −19.01% | $8,099 | −19.01% |
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | no history | ||
| Factor | −12.05% | $8,795 | −12.33% |
| Income | −10.09% | $8,991 | −11.57% |
| Tactical | −12.17% | $8,783 | −13.19% |
| Thematic | −26.82% | $7,318 | −28.51% |
| Strategic | −18.78% | $8,122 | −18.78% |
Not shown where the window starts before a history: Tax-aware 95 (from Aug 25, 2015). A window is never cut to fit.
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | no history | ||
| Factor | no history | ||
| Income | no history | ||
| Tactical | +1.47% | $10,147 | −8.33% |
| Thematic | +5.88% | $10,588 | −8.00% |
| Strategic | +1.31% | $10,131 | −8.46% |
Not shown where the window starts before a history: Tax-aware 95 (from Aug 25, 2015), Factor 95 (from Jul 18, 2013) and Income 95 (from Jun 24, 2013). A window is never cut to fit.
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | no history | ||
| Factor | no history | ||
| Income | no history | ||
| Tactical | −12.25% | $8,775 | −18.68% |
| Thematic | −22.35% | $7,765 | −22.35% |
| Strategic | −22.54% | $7,746 | −22.54% |
Not shown where the window starts before a history: Tax-aware 95 (from Aug 25, 2015), Factor 95 (from Jul 18, 2013) and Income 95 (from Jun 24, 2013). A window is never cut to fit.
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | no history | ||
| Factor | no history | ||
| Income | no history | ||
| Tactical | no history | ||
| Thematic | no history | ||
| Strategic | −15.55% | $8,445 | −15.55% |
Not shown where the window starts before a history: Tax-aware 95 (from Aug 25, 2015), Factor 95 (from Jul 18, 2013), Income 95 (from Jun 24, 2013), Tactical 95 (from Nov 1, 2010) and Thematic 95 (from Jan 3, 2011). A window is never cut to fit.
| Member | Return | On $10,000 | Max DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tax-aware | no history | ||
| Factor | no history | ||
| Income | no history | ||
| Tactical | no history | ||
| Thematic | no history | ||
| Strategic | −10.18% | $8,982 | −10.18% |
Not shown where the window starts before a history: Tax-aware 95 (from Aug 25, 2015), Factor 95 (from Jul 18, 2013), Income 95 (from Jun 24, 2013), Tactical 95 (from Nov 1, 2010) and Thematic 95 (from Jan 3, 2011). A window is never cut to fit.
Common period Sep 30, 2016 to Sep 30, 2026, the longest window all six publish. Every portfolio keeps its colour on every chart and header; names are always in text.
Questions people ask about the benchmarks at 95% stocks
- What does this page compare?
- The six ETFIQ benchmarks that hold 95% stocks: Tax-aware 95, Factor 95, Income 95, Tactical 95 and Thematic 95, and Strategic 95 as the reference. Each is a written rule over broad, low-cost ETFs; none is a fund or a recommendation.
- Why is Strategic 95 the reference?
- ETFIQ measures every benchmark outside the strategic family against ETFIQ Strategic at the same stock share, so beta, the captures and the difference in return on each benchmark’s own page are against Strategic 95.
- How is the overlap measured?
- For each pair, the weight the two hold in the same securities: for every security both hold through their funds’ published books, the smaller of its two shares, added up. A holding with no security id cannot be matched, so the figure is a floor.
- Why are the returns hypothetical?
- ETFIQ froze the rules on Oct 3, 2026. Returns before Oct 5, 2026 apply today’s rule and funds to earlier prices, which is look-ahead; returns from that date are tracked. The price source does not carry funds that closed before 2016, so nothing here is free of survivorship bias.
ETFIQ, Six ETFIQ benchmarks at 95% stocks, compared, data as of Oct 7, 2026. https://etfiq.com/
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data. Figures before Oct 5, 2026 are hypothetical.
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices. Data sourced by Tiingo.