Do URA and UX hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, URA or UX?

URA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and UX has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, URA or UX?

URA charges 0.69% a year and UX charges 0.77%, so URA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

URA vs UX: which is really different?

URA and UX hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and UX returned −9.2% over the year. Global X Uranium ETF and Roundhill Uranium ETF.

0.0%

URA in the S&P 500

0.0%

UX in the S&P 500

−12.3%

URA total return, 1 year

−9.2%

UX total return, 1 year

URA · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

UX · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of UX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · URA scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

URA 92

UX 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, URA and UX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding URA UX

Only in URA

CAMECO CORP 22.04%

SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM TR 6.83%

NEXGEN ENERGY LTD 5.98%

OKLO INC 5.72%

URANIUM ENERGY CORP 4.67%

NAC KAZATOMPROM JSC-GDR REGS 4.37%

PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.09%

ENERGY FUELS INC 2.89%

Only in UX

TREASURY BILL 80.95%

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 19.05%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	URA	UX	URA	UX	URA	UX
3 months	−7.7%	+2.1%	−10.2 pts	−0.4 pts	−9.8 pts	0.0 pts
6 months	−19.1%	−9.5%	−36.1 pts	−26.5 pts	−46.0 pts	−36.4 pts
1 year	−12.3%	−9.2%	−28.0 pts	−24.9 pts	−36.1 pts	−33.0 pts
3 years	+68.7%	not published	−16.3 pts	not published	−41.3 pts	not published
Since launch URA Nov 2010 · UX Jan 2025	−40.1%	+8.4%	−763.8 pts	−20.8 pts	−1521.0 pts	−34.8 pts

URA and UX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

URA

Global X Uranium ETF · Holds 63 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Roundhill Uranium ETF · Holds 2 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Global X Roundhill

Theme Nuclear and uranium Nuclear and uranium

In the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 63 2

Top ten, share of the fund 61.1% 100.0%

Expense ratio 0.69% 0.77%

Fee for the differing part 0.69% 0.77%

Total return, 1 year −12.3% −9.2%

vs the S&P 500 −28.0 pts −24.9 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −36.1 pts −33.0 pts

Below its high −54.6% −24.2%

Net assets $5.6bn $4m

URA and UX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

URA in plain words

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 63 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −12.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 28.0 pts. It sits 54.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

UX in plain words

By weight, 0% of UX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 2 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −9.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 24.9 pts. It sits 24.2% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do URA and UX hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, URA or UX?: URA has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and UX has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, URA or UX?: URA charges 0.69% a year and UX charges 0.77%, so URA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

URA vs URNM URA vs AIRR URA vs ARKK URA vs ARTY UX vs NUKZ UX vs RCTR UX vs NLR UX vs SMRF

URA on its own →UX on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

URA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗URA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Global X page for URA ↗UX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗UX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Roundhill page for UX ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, URA against UX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ura-vs-ux

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.