Do NUKZ and UX hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, NUKZ or UX?

NUKZ has 23% of its weight in S&P 500 names and UX has 0%, so UX differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, NUKZ or UX?

NUKZ charges 0.85% a year and UX charges 0.77%, so UX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

NUKZ vs UX: which is really different?

NUKZ and UX hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NUKZ returned −6.6% over the year. Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF and Roundhill Uranium ETF.

23.1%

NUKZ in the S&P 500

0.0%

UX in the S&P 500

−6.6%

NUKZ total return, 1 year

−9.2%

UX total return, 1 year

NUKZ · 1 year to Sep 30, 202677% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

23% of NUKZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index

UX · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of UX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · UX scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

NUKZ 57.6

UX 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NUKZ and UX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding NUKZ UX

Only in NUKZ

CAMECO CORPORATION 9.10%

SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION 3.45%

GE VERNOVA INC. 3.34%

TALEN ENERGY CORP 3.27%

ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC 3.02%

CEZ, a.s. 2.98%

Dominion Energy, Inc. 2.92%

Endesa, Sociedad Anonima 2.87%

Only in UX

TREASURY BILL 80.95%

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 19.05%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	NUKZ	UX	NUKZ	UX	NUKZ	UX
3 months	−9.9%	+2.1%	−12.4 pts	−0.4 pts	−12.0 pts	0.0 pts
6 months	−10.4%	−9.5%	−27.4 pts	−26.5 pts	−37.3 pts	−36.4 pts
1 year	−6.6%	−9.2%	−22.3 pts	−24.9 pts	−30.4 pts	−33.0 pts
Since launch NUKZ Jan 2024 · UX Jan 2025	+142.1%	+8.4%	+79.8 pts	−20.8 pts	+65.8 pts	−34.8 pts

NUKZ and UX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NUKZ

Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF · Holds 46 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 23% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Roundhill Uranium ETF · Holds 2 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Range Roundhill

Theme Nuclear and uranium Nuclear and uranium

In the S&P 500 23.1% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.7% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 2.6% 0.0%

Holdings 46 2

Top ten, share of the fund 36.4% 100.0%

Expense ratio 0.85% 0.77%

Fee for the differing part 0.86% 0.77%

Total return, 1 year −6.6% −9.2%

vs the S&P 500 −22.3 pts −24.9 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −30.4 pts −33.0 pts

Below its high −21.0% −24.2%

Net assets $890m $4m

NUKZ and UX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NUKZ in plain words

By weight, 23% of NUKZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 46 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −6.6% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.3 pts. It sits 21.0% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

UX in plain words

By weight, 0% of UX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 2 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −9.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 24.9 pts. It sits 24.2% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do NUKZ and UX hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, NUKZ or UX?: NUKZ has 23% of its weight in S&P 500 names and UX has 0%, so UX differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NUKZ or UX?: NUKZ charges 0.85% a year and UX charges 0.77%, so UX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

NUKZ vs URNM NUKZ vs URNJ NUKZ vs RCTR NUKZ vs SMRF UX vs RCTR UX vs SMRF UX vs TNUK UX vs URAN

NUKZ on its own →UX on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

NUKZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗NUKZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Range website ↗UX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗UX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Roundhill page for UX ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, NUKZ against UX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nukz-vs-ux

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.