NUKZ vs TNUK: which is really different?

NUKZ and TNUK hold 39% of their weight in the same names. Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF and Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF.

23.1%
NUKZ in the S&P 500
17.5%
TNUK in the S&P 500
−6.6%
NUKZ total return, 1 year
−11.8%
TNUK total return, since launch
NUKZ · 1 year to Sep 30, 202677% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
77% of its weight is outside the S&P 50023% of NUKZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index23%77%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 36% of the fund · 46 holdings filed May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 3% in77% of its weight is outside the S&P 50023% of NUKZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index23%77%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 36% of the fund

23% of NUKZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 77% is outside the index

TNUK · 6 months to Sep 30, 202683% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
83% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of TNUK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 83% is outside the index18%83%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 62% of the fund · 25 holdings filed May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 5% in83% of its weight is outside the S&P 50018% of TNUK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 83% is outside the index18%83%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 62% of the fund

18% of TNUK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 83% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · TNUK scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NUKZ and TNUK hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

half

39% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding NUKZ TNUK
CAMECO CORPORATION 9.10% 7.48%
TALEN ENERGY CORP 3.27% 6.90%
ROLLS-ROYCE HOLDINGS PLC 3.02% 5.06%
VISTRA CORP. 2.75% 4.70%
Fortum Oyj 2.63% 4.50%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION. 2.62% 4.51%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION 2.50% 8.15%
JACOBS SOLUTIONS INC. 2.11% 2.11%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 1.84% 6.66%
Oklo Inc 2.32% 1.77%
Nuscale Power Corp 1.76% 1.73%
URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 1.46% 4.97%
Only in NUKZ
SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION 3.45%
CEZ, a.s. 2.98%
Dominion Energy, Inc. 2.92%
Endesa, Sociedad Anonima 2.87%
SOLSTICE ADVANCED MATERIALS INC. 2.71%
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 2.55%
PG&E CORPORATION 2.48%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. 2.48%
Only in TNUK
Doosan Enerbility Co Ltd 6.94%
Public Service Enterprise Grou 4.75%
NAC Kazatomprom JSC 2.31%
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF 2.05%
Range Nuclear Renaissance Inde 2.05%
NexGen Energy Ltd 1.29%
Denison Mines Corp 1.09%
Energy Fuels Inc/Canada 0.83%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

39% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowNUKZTNUKNUKZTNUKNUKZTNUK
3 months−9.9%−10.1%−12.4 pts−12.6 pts−12.0 pts−12.2 pts
6 months−10.4%−15.3%−27.4 pts−32.3 pts−37.3 pts−42.2 pts
1 year−6.6%not published−22.3 ptsnot published−30.4 ptsnot published
Since launch
NUKZ Jan 2024 · TNUK Dec 2025
+142.1%−11.8%+79.8 pts−25.7 pts+65.8 pts−33.8 pts

NUKZ and TNUK over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF · Holds 46 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 23% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
TNUK
Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF · Holds 25 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 18% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Range Tortoise
Theme Nuclear and uranium Nuclear and uranium
In the S&P 500 23.1% 17.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.7% 99.2%
In the Nasdaq-100 2.6% 4.5%
Holdings 46 25
Top ten, share of the fund 36.4% 61.8%
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.85%
Fee for the differing part 0.86% 0.86%
Total return, 1 year −6.6% −11.8% (since launch on Dec 18, 2025)
vs the S&P 500 −22.3 pts −25.7 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −30.4 pts −33.8 pts
Below its high −21.0% −26.4%
Net assets $890m $2m

NUKZ and TNUK on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NUKZ in plain words

By weight, 23% of NUKZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 46 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −6.6% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.3 pts. It sits 21.0% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

TNUK in plain words

By weight, 18% of TNUK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 25 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Since it launched on Dec 18, 2025 the fund returned −11.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.9% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 25.7 pts. It sits 26.4% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do NUKZ and TNUK hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, NUKZ or TNUK?
NUKZ has 23% of its weight in S&P 500 names and TNUK has 18%, so TNUK differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, NUKZ or TNUK?
NUKZ charges 0.85% a year and TNUK charges 0.85%, so NUKZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, NUKZ against TNUK, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nukz-vs-tnuk

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.