URA vs URNM: which is really different?
URA and URNM hold 41% of their weight in the same names, and URA returned −12.3% over the year. Global X Uranium ETF and SPROTT URANIUM MINERS ETF.
0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index
0% of URNM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index
A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, URA and URNM hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
41% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
41% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | URA | URNM | URA | URNM | URA | URNM |
| 3 months | −7.7% | −9.4% | −10.2 pts | −11.9 pts | −9.8 pts | −11.5 pts |
| 6 months | −19.1% | −25.7% | −36.1 pts | −42.7 pts | −46.0 pts | −52.6 pts |
| 1 year | −12.3% | −18.9% | −28.0 pts | −34.6 pts | −36.1 pts | −42.7 pts |
| 3 years | +68.7% | +10.8% | −16.3 pts | −74.2 pts | −41.3 pts | −99.2 pts |
| Since launch URA Nov 2010 · URNM Dec 2019 | −40.1% | +352.5% | −763.8 pts | +181.7 pts | −1521.0 pts | +71.1 pts |
URA and URNM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
URA and URNM on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 63 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −12.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 28.0 pts. It sits 54.6% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
URNM in plain words
By weight, 0% of URNM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 77% of the fund across 26 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −18.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 34.6 pts. It sits 43.5% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do URA and URNM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 41% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, URA against URNM, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ura-vs-urnm
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, URA against URNM, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ura-vs-urnm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, URA against URNM, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ura-vs-urnm
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). URA against URNM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ura-vs-urnm
- Markdown
- [URA against URNM (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ura-vs-urnm)