Do URNM and UX hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, URNM or UX?

URNM has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and UX has 0%, so URNM differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, URNM or UX?

URNM charges 0.75% a year and UX charges 0.77%, so URNM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

URNM vs UX: which is really different?

URNM and UX hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and UX returned −9.2% over the year. SPROTT URANIUM MINERS ETF and Roundhill Uranium ETF.

0.0%

URNM in the S&P 500

0.0%

UX in the S&P 500

−18.9%

URNM total return, 1 year

−9.2%

UX total return, 1 year

URNM · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of URNM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

UX · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of UX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · URNM scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

URNM 92

UX 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, URNM and UX hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

50%

half

14% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding URNM UX

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 13.99% 19.05%

Only in URNM

Cameco Corp 18.16%

Nexgen Energy Ltd 12.00%

Energy Fuels Inc/canada 5.16%

Denison Mines Corp 5.13%

Nac Kazatomprom Jsc 5.13%

Deep Yellow Ltd 4.63%

Uranium Energy Corp 4.50%

Paladin Energy Ltd 4.40%

Only in UX

TREASURY BILL 80.95%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

14% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	URNM	UX	URNM	UX	URNM	UX
3 months	−9.4%	+2.1%	−11.9 pts	−0.4 pts	−11.5 pts	0.0 pts
6 months	−25.7%	−9.5%	−42.7 pts	−26.5 pts	−52.6 pts	−36.4 pts
1 year	−18.9%	−9.2%	−34.6 pts	−24.9 pts	−42.7 pts	−33.0 pts
3 years	+10.8%	not published	−74.2 pts	not published	−99.2 pts	not published
Since launch URNM Dec 2019 · UX Jan 2025	+352.5%	+8.4%	+181.7 pts	−20.8 pts	+71.1 pts	−34.8 pts

URNM and UX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

URNM

SPROTT URANIUM MINERS ETF · Holds 26 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Roundhill Uranium ETF · Holds 2 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Sprott Roundhill

Theme Nuclear and uranium Nuclear and uranium

In the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 26 2

Top ten, share of the fund 77.4% 100.0%

Expense ratio 0.75% 0.77%

Fee for the differing part 0.75% 0.77%

Total return, 1 year −18.9% −9.2%

vs the S&P 500 −34.6 pts −24.9 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −42.7 pts −33.0 pts

Below its high −43.5% −24.2%

Net assets $1.8bn $4m

URNM and UX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

URNM in plain words

By weight, 0% of URNM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 77% of the fund across 26 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −18.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 34.6 pts. It sits 43.5% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

UX in plain words

By weight, 0% of UX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 2 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −9.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 24.9 pts. It sits 24.2% below its all-time high of Jan 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do URNM and UX hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, URNM or UX?: URNM has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and UX has 0%, so URNM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, URNM or UX?: URNM charges 0.75% a year and UX charges 0.77%, so URNM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

URNM vs NLR URNM vs NUKZ URNM vs RCTR URNM vs SMRF UX vs URAN UX vs URNJ UX vs NLR UX vs NUKZ

URNM on its own →UX on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

URNM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗URNM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Sprott page for URNM ↗UX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗UX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Roundhill page for UX ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, URNM against UX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/urnm-vs-ux

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.