Do SMH and XBI hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, SMH or XBI?

SMH has 79% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XBI has 13%, so XBI differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, SMH or XBI?

SMH and XBI both charge 0.35% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

SMH vs XBI: which is really different?

SMH and XBI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SMH returned +75.3% over the year. VanEck Semiconductor ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.

Both cost 0.35% a year; their one-year returns differ by 30.3 points; SMH is 7.4 times larger.

	SMH	XBI
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$73.2bn	$9.9bn
Total return, 1 year	+75.3%	+45.0%
What it tracks	Semiconductors	Biotech
Holdings in common	0%
S&P 500, total return, 1 year	+17.3%
Against the S&P 500, 1 year	ahead by 58.1 pts	ahead by 27.7 pts
Below its all-time high	9.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026	11.1%, high on Feb 8, 2021

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

79.1%

SMH in the S&P 500

12.7%

XBI in the S&P 500

+75.3%

SMH total return, 1 year

+45.0%

XBI total return, 1 year

SMH · 1 year to Oct 9, 202621% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

79% of SMH's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 21% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

XBI · 1 year to Oct 9, 202687% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

13% of XBI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · XBI scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

SMH 11.1

XBI 55.2

0.1, the lowest in this set92.3, the highest

A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SMH and XBI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding SMH XBI

Only in SMH

Nvidia Corp 19.60%

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co L 9.30%

Advanced Micro Devices Inc 5.66%

Broadcom Inc 5.34%

Micron Technology Inc 4.79%

Texas Instruments Inc 4.70%

Marvell Technology Inc 4.66%

Applied Materials Inc 4.64%

Only in XBI

MODERNA INC 2.20%

TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP 1.84%

NATERA INC 1.79%

ABBVIE INC 1.65%

UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORP 1.59%

AMGEN INC 1.58%

BIOGEN INC 1.57%

HALOZYME THERAPEUTICS INC 1.55%

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	SMH	XBI	SMH	XBI	SMH	XBI
3 months	−1.3%	−3.3%	−4.6 pts	−6.7 pts	−4.9 pts	−7.0 pts
6 months	+38.1%	+18.9%	+22.9 pts	+3.8 pts	+14.9 pts	−4.3 pts
1 year	+75.3%	+45.0%	+58.1 pts	+27.7 pts	+51.7 pts	+21.4 pts
3 years	+308.2%	+114.6%	+222.4 pts	+28.8 pts	+200.9 pts	+7.3 pts
Since launch SMH Dec 2011 · XBI Feb 2006	+4,627.9%	+890.7%	+3,916.6 pts	+92.2 pts	+3,203.2 pts	−1,164.7 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF · Holds 25 stocks in semiconductors, 79% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

XBI

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF · Holds 165 stocks in biotech, 13% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer VanEck State Street

Theme Semiconductors Biotech

In the S&P 500 79.1% 12.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 80.7% 98.4%

In the Nasdaq-100 77.4% 8.5%

Holdings 25 165

Top ten, share of the fund 67.7% 16.9%

Expense ratio 0.35% 0.35%

Fee for the differing part 0.43% 0.36%

Total return, 1 year +75.3% +45.0%

vs the S&P 500 +58.1 pts +27.7 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 +51.7 pts +21.4 pts

Below its high −9.8% −11.1%

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $73.2bn $9.9bn

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SMH in plain words

By weight, 79% of SMH's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 81%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +75.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 58.1 pts. It sits 9.8% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

XBI in plain words

By weight, 13% of XBI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 165 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +45.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 27.7 pts. It sits 11.1% below its all-time high of Feb 8, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do SMH and XBI hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, SMH or XBI?: SMH has 79% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XBI has 13%, so XBI differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, SMH or XBI?: SMH and XBI both charge 0.35% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

SMH vs IBB SMH vs URA SMH vs CIBR SMH vs DRAM XBI vs SOXX XBI vs DRAM XBI vs CIBR XBI vs IGV

SMH on its own →XBI on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

SMH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SMH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VanEck website ↗XBI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗XBI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗State Street website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, SMH against XBI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/smh-vs-xbi

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.