Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

REXC vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

REXC and SILJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about REXC and SILJ

Net assets: $71m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF, and $2.9bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF.

At a glance
0.0%
REXC in the S&P 500
0.0%
SILJ in the S&P 500
−39.1%
REXC total return, since launch, Apr 15, 2026
+19.6%
SILJ total return, 1 year
REXC · 6 months to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 75% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SILJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 60% of the fund · 66 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of SILJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

REXC costs 0.04 points a year less; SILJ is far larger, $2.9bn against $71m.

REXC vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureREXCSILJ
Return
Total return, 1 yearnot published+19.6%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high46.3%, high on May 6, 202639.4%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRare earth and critical materialsSilver miners
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.69%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$71m$2.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, REXC and SILJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first REXC SILJ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in REXC
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 21.26%
MP Materials Corp. 18.95%
Iluka Resources Ltd. 5.57%
Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.36%
Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.57%
USA Rare Earth Inc. 4.34%
Critical Metals Corp. 4.27%
Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 3.96%
Only in SILJ
Hecla Mining Co 10.28%
First Majestic Silver Corp 9.95%
COEUR MINING INC. 9.50%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 6.31%
Boliden AB 4.68%
SSR Mining Inc 4.61%
Aya Gold & Silver Inc 4.32%
Endeavour Silver Corp 3.54%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: REXC vs SILJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowREXCSILJ
3 months−26.7%−12.0%
6 months−46.3%−21.4%
1 year–+19.6%
3 years–+205.4%
Since launchNot the same days: REXC Apr 2026 · SILJ Nov 2012−39.1%+42.1%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF · Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF · Holds 66 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Rare earth and critical materials Silver miners
In the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 41 66
Top ten, share of the fund 74.8% 59.6%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.69%
Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.69%
Total return, 1 year −39.1% (since launch, Apr 15, 2026) +19.6%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −46.3% −39.4%
Net assets, REXC as of Nov 4, 2026 and SILJ as of Nov 3, 2026 $71m $2.9bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

SILJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
REXC

By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −39.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 46.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

SILJ

By weight, 0% of SILJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 66 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 39.4% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do REXC and SILJ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or SILJ?
REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SILJ has 0%, so REXC differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, REXC or SILJ?
REXC charges 0.65% a year and SILJ charges 0.69%, so REXC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, REXC against SILJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-silj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.