Do REXC and SIL hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or SIL?

REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SIL has 0%, so REXC differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, REXC or SIL?

REXC and SIL both charge 0.65% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

REXC vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

REXC and SIL hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about REXC and SIL

Net assets: $71m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF, and $4.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Silver Miners ETF.

REXC on its own →SIL on its own →

At a glance

0.0%

REXC in the S&P 500

0.0%

SIL in the S&P 500

−39.1%

REXC total return, since launch, Apr 15, 2026

+27.1%

SIL total return, 1 year

REXC · 6 months to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of REXC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

SIL · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of SIL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.65% a year; SIL is far larger, $4.4bn against $74m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

REXC vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	REXC	SIL
Return
Measure	REXC	SIL
Total return, 1 year	not published	+27.1%
Drawdown
Measure	REXC	SIL
Below its all-time high	46.3%, high on May 6, 2026	33.7%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	REXC	SIL
What it tracks	Rare earth and critical materials	Silver miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		ahead by 12.1 pts
Cost and size
Measure	REXC	SIL
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$74m	$4.4bn
Holdings
Measure	REXC	SIL
Holdings in common	0%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, REXC and SIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first REXC SIL

Only in one fund ↓

Only in REXC

Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. 21.26%

MP Materials Corp. 18.95%

Iluka Resources Ltd. 5.57%

Neo Performance Materials Inc. 5.36%

Sunrise Energy Metals Ltd. 4.57%

USA Rare Earth Inc. 4.34%

Critical Metals Corp. 4.27%

Arafura Rare Earths Ltd. 3.96%

Only in SIL

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. 22.38%

Pan American Silver Corp. 12.54%

COEUR MINING, INC. 10.59%

INDUSTRIAS PENOLES, S.A.B. DE C.V. 5.21%

HECLA MINING COMPANY 4.63%

FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER CORP. 4.47%

FRESNILLO PLC 4.30%

Compania de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. 4.18%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: REXC vs SIL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	REXC	SIL	REXC	SIL
3 months	−26.7%	−6.8%	not measured	−5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−46.3%	−17.4%	not measured	−20.0 pts vs ACWI
1 year	–	+27.1%	–	+12.1 pts vs ACWI
3 years	–	+223.9%	–	+146.3 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: REXC Apr 2026 · SIL Apr 2010	−39.1%	+110.6%	not measured	−282.3 pts vs ACWI

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF · Holds 41 stocks in rare earth and critical materials, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF · Holds 39 stocks in silver miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Sprott Global X

Theme Rare earth and critical materials Silver miners

In the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 41 39

Top ten, share of the fund 74.8% 76.3%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.65%

Total return, 1 year −39.1% (since launch, Apr 15, 2026) +27.1%

vs its benchmark not measured +12.1 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −46.3% −33.7%

Net assets, REXC as of Nov 4, 2026 and SIL as of Oct 12, 2026 $71m $4.4bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

REXC

By weight, 0% of REXC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 75% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −39.1% with distributions reinvested. It sits 46.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

SIL

By weight, 0% of SIL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 12.1 pts. It sits 33.7% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do REXC and SIL hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, REXC or SIL?: REXC has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SIL has 0%, so REXC differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, REXC or SIL?: REXC and SIL both charge 0.65% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

REXC vs AGMI REXC vs SILJ REXC vs SLVP REXC vs SETM SIL vs WDIG SIL vs EART SIL vs FMTL SIL vs ISTM

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →REXC on its own →SIL on its own →REXC holdings →SIL dividend history →SIL holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

REXC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

REXC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Sprott page for REXC ↗

SIL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SIL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for SIL ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, REXC against SIL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/rexc-vs-sil

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.